South Africa, vol. II. — Themes and Context
Edition facts
This digital edition of South Africa, vol. II. — Themes and Context is described by source-level measurements including 100,978 words, 7 hr 20 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “South Africa -- Description and travel,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
THE TRANSVAAL.--NEWCASTLE TO PRETORIA 3
THE TRANSVAAL.--ITS HISTORY 26
THE TRANSVAAL.--ANNEXATION 50
THE TRANSVAAL.--PRETORIA 67
THE TRANSVAAL.--ITS CONDITION AND PRODUCTS 89
THE TRANSVAAL.--PRETORIA TO THE DIAMOND FIELDS 112
GRIQUALAND WEST--WHY WE TOOK IT 137
THE STORY OF THE DIAMOND FIELDS 161
THE ORANGE FREE STATE.
THE ORANGE FREE STATE.--ITS EARLY HISTORY 209
THE ORANGE FREE STATE.--PRESENT CONDITION 232
THE ORANGE FREE STATE.--BLOEMFONTEIN 256
KRELI AND HIS KAFIRS 286
THE TRANSVAAL.--NEWCASTLE TO PRETORIA.
THE distance from Newcastle to Pretoria is 207 miles. About 20 miles north from Newcastle we crossed the borders of what used to be the Transvaal Republic, but which since the 12th August last,--1877,--forms a separate British Colony under the dominion of Her Majesty. The geographical configuration here is remarkable as at the point of contact between Natal and the Transvaal the boundary of the Orange Free State is not above two or three miles distant, and that of Zulu Land, which is at present but ill defined, not very far off;--so that in the event of the Transvaal being joined to Natal the combined Colonies would hang together by a very narrow neck of land.
Of all our dominions the Transvaal is probably the most remote. Its Capital is 400 miles from the sea, and that distance is not annihilated or even relieved by any railway. When I left home my main object perhaps was to visit this remote district, of which I had never heard much and in which I had been interested not at all, till six months before I started on my journey. Then the country had been a foreign Republic, not very stable as was supposed, and assimilated in my mind with some of the South American Republics which so often change their name and their condition and in which the stanchest lovers of the Republican form of Government hardly put much faith. Now I was in the country and was not only assured myself as to its future security,--but was assured also of the assurance of all who were concerned. Whether Great Britain had done right or wrong to annex the Transvaal, every sod of its soil had instantly been made of double value to its proprietor by the deed which had been done.
Here I was in the Transvaal through which at a period long since that of my own birth lions used to roam at will, and the tribes of the Swazies and Matabeles used to work their will against each other, unconscious of the coming of the white man. Now there are no lions in the land,--and, as far as I could see as I made my journey, very few Natives in the parts which had really been inhabited by the Dutch.
I cannot say that the hotels along the road were very good. By the ordinary travelling Englishman the accommodation would have been considered very bad;--but we did find places in which we could shelter ourselves, and beds of some kind were provided for us. A separate bedroom had become a luxury dear to the imagination and perpetuated by memory. We were a week on the road from Newcastle and pulled off our clothes but once,--when we were under the hospitable roof of Mrs. Swickhard, who keeps a store about half way at a place called Standers Drift. At one or two places there were little Inns, always called hotels, and at others we were taken in by farmers or storekeepers. Sometimes the spot on which we were invited to lie down was so uninviting as to require the summoning up of a special courage. Twice I think we were called upon to occupy the same bed,--on which occasions my age preserved me from the hard ground on which my younger companion had to stretch himself. He had stories to tell of nocturnal visitors to which I have ever been inhospital and useless,--the only wild beast that has ever attacked me being the musquito. Of musquitoes in the Transvaal I had no experience, and was told that even in summer they are not violent. We were travelling in September, which is equal in its circumstances to our March at home. So much for our beds. On our route we banqueted at times like princes,--but these were the times in which we camped out in the veld,--the open field side,--and consumed our own provisions. Never was such tea made as we had. And yet the tea in all the houses was bad,--generally so bad as to be undrinkable. We had bought our tea, as other Colonists buy theirs, at Pieter Maritzburg, and I do not think that the grocer had done anything peculiar for us. But we were determined that the water should boil, that the proper number of tea-spoon-fulls should be afforded, and that the tea should have every chance. We certainly succeeded. And surely never was there such bacon fried, or such cold tongues extracted from tin pots. It happened more than once that we were forced by circumstances to breakfast at houses on the road,--but when we did so we always breakfasted again a few miles off by the side of some spruit,--Anglice brook,--where our horses could get water and eat their forage.
The matter of forage is the main question for all travellers through these parts of South Africa. Let a man sleep where he may and eat what he will, he can go on. Let him sleep not at all and eat but little, he can have himself dragged to his destination. The will within him to reach a given place carries him safely through great hardships. But it is not so with your horse,--and is less so in the Transvaal than in any other country in which I have travelled. We soon learned that our chief care must be to provide proper food for our team, if we wished to reach Pretoria,--let alone those further towns, Kimberley and Bloemfontein. Now there are three modes in which a horse may be fed on such a journey. He may nibble the grass,--or cut his own bread and butter,--as horses do successfully in Australia; but if left to that resource he will soon cease to drag the vehicle after him in South Africa. Or he may be fed upon mealies. I hope my reader has already learned that maize or Indian corn is so called in South Africa. Mealies are easily carried, and are almost always to be purchased along the road. But horses fed upon them while at fast work become subject to sickness and die upon the journey. If used at all they should be steeped in water and dried, but even then they are pernicious except in small quantities. Forage is the only thing. Now forage consists of corn cut green, wheat or oats or barley,--dried with the grain in it and preserved in bundles, like hay. It is cumbrous to carry and it will frequently happen that it cannot be bought on the road side. But you must have forage, or you will not get to your journey’s end. We did manage to supply ourselves, sometimes carrying a large roll of it inside the cart as well as a sack filled with it outside. Every farmer grows a little of it through the country; and the storekeepers along the road, who buy it at 3d. a bundle sell it for a shilling or eighteen pence in accordance with their conscience. But yet we were always in alarm lest we should find ourselves without it. A horse requires about six bundles a day to be adequately fed for continual work. “Have you got forage?” was the first question always asked when the cart was stopped and one of us descended to enquire as to the accommodation that might be forthcoming.
We travelled something over thirty miles a day, always being careful not to allow the horses to remain at their work above two hours and a half at a time. Then we would “out-span,”--take the horses out from the carriage, knee-hobble them and turn them loose with their forage spread upon the ground. Then all our energies would be devoted to the tea kettle and the frying pan.
As we travelled most heartrending accounts reached us of the fate of my companions from Pieter Maritzburg to Newcastle, who had pursued their journey by the mail cart to Pretoria. This conveyance is not supposed absolutely to travel night and day;--nor does it go regularly by day and stop regularly by night in a Christian fashion, but makes its progress with such diminished periods of relaxation as the condition of the animals drawing it may create. If the roads and animals be good, four or six hours in the twenty-four may be allowed to the weary passengers;--but if not,--if as at this time they both be very bad, the periods of relaxation are only those necessary for taking up the mail bags and catching the animals which are somewhere out on the veld, hobbled, and biding their time. For the mail cart the road was very bad indeed, while by our happy luck, for us it was very good. They travelled through two days and nights of uninterrupted rain by which the roads and rivers were at once made almost equally impassable; while for us, so quick are the changes effected, everything had become dry and at the same time free from dust. From place to place we heard of them,--how the three unfortunates had walked into one place fifteen miles in advance of the cart, wet through, carrying their shoes and stockings in their hands, and had then slept upon the ground till the vehicle had come up, the mules had been caught, and they had been carried on a mile or two when they had again been forced to walk. They were at this period two days late and had been travelling on these conditions for four days and four nights with the journey yet unfinished before them. Had I been one of them I think they would have been forced to leave me behind them on the way side. On the road we met their conveyance coming back. It had carried them to a certain point and had thence returned. It was a miserable box on wheels with two mules whose wretched bones seemed to come through their skin. They could not raise a trot though they had no load but the black driver, and I presume some mail bags.
Nor was any one to blame for all this,--except the late Government. For two years and a half the Contractor had done the work without receiving his pay. That he should have gone on and done it at all is the marvel;--but he had persevered spending all that he could make elsewhere upon the effort. When the annexation came he was paid his arrears in lump,--very much no doubt to his comfort; but then there were new tenders and a new contract and it was hardly to be expected that he should lay out his happily recovered money in providing horses and conveyances for a month or two.
I was assured, and I believe truly, that this special journey,--which I did not take,--was the most unfortunate that had ever occurred on this unfortunate road. The animals had of course gone down the hill from bad to worse, and then had come the heavy rain. It seemed to be almost a direct Providence which had rescued me from its misery.
As I passed along the road I took every opportunity that came in my way of entering the houses of the Dutch. I had heard much of the manners of the Boers, and of their low condition of life. I had been told that they were altogether unprogressive,--that the Boer farmer of this day was as his father had been, that so had been the grandfather and the great grandfather, and that so was the son about to be; that they were uneducated, dirty in their habits, ignorant of comforts, and parsimonious in the extreme. These are the main accusations brought against the Boers as a race, and they are supported by various allegations in detail;--as that they do not send their children to school; that large families live in two roomed houses, fathers mothers sons and daughters sleeping in one chamber; that they never wash, and wear their clothes day and night without changing them; that they will live upon the carcases of wild beasts and blesboks which they can shoot upon the lands so as to reduce their expenditure on food to a minimum;--that they are averse to neighbours, and that they will pay for no labour, thus leaving their large farms untilled and to a great extent unpastured. And added to all this it is said that the Boer is particularly averse to all change, resolving not only to do as his father has done before him, but also that his son shall do the like for the future.
The reader will probably perceive that these charges indicate an absence of that civilization which is produced in the world by the congregated intelligences of many persons. Had Shakespeare been born on a remote South African farm he would have been Shakespeare still; but he would not have worn a starched frill to his shirt. The Dutch Boer is what he is, not because he is Dutch or because he is a Boer, but because circumstances have isolated him. The Spaniards had probably reached as luxurious a mode of living as any European people when they achieved their American possessions, but I have no hesitation in saying that the Spaniards who now inhabit the ranches and remote farms of Costa Rica or Columbia are in a poorer condition of life than the Dutch Boers of the Transvaal. I have seen Germans located in certain unfortunate spots about the world who have been reduced lower in the order of humanity than any Dutchmen that I have beheld. And I have been within the houses of English Free Settlers in remote parts of Australia which have had quite as little to show in the way of comfort as any Boer’s homestead.
Such comparisons are only useful as showing that distance from crowded centres will produce the same falling off in civilization among one people as among another. The two points of interest in the matter are,--first the actual condition of these people who have now become British subjects, and secondly how far there is a prospect of improvement. I am now speaking of my journey from Natal up to Pretoria. When commencing that journey, though I had seen many Dutchmen in South Africa I had seen none of the Boer race; and I was told that those living near to the road would hardly be fair specimens of their kind. There was very little on the road to assist in civilizing them and that little had not existed long. From what I afterwards saw I am inclined to think that the impressions first made upon me were not incorrect.
The farmers’ houses generally consisted of two main rooms, with probably some small excrescence which would serve some of the family as a sleeping apartment. In the living room there would be a fire-place, and outside the house, probably at thirty or forty yards’ distance, there would be a huge oven built. The houses would never be floored, the uneven ground being sufficiently solid and also sufficiently clean for the Dutchman’s purposes. There would seldom be a wall-paper or any internal painting of the woodwork. Two solid deal tables, with solid deal settees or benches,--not unfrequently with a locker under them,--would be the chief furniture. There might be a chair or two, but not more than one or two. There would always be a clock, and a not insufficient supply of cups, saucers, and basins. Knives, forks, and spoons would be there. The bed room of course would be a sanctum; but my curiosity,--or diligence in the performance of the duty on which I was intent,--enables me to say that there is always a large bedstead, with a large feather bed, a counterpane, and apparently a pair of sheets. The traveller in Central America will see but little of such decencies among the Spanish farmers there.
Things in the Boer’s house no doubt are generally dirty. An earthen floor will make everything dirty,--whether in Ireland or in the Transvaal. The Boer’s dress is dirty,--and also, which is more important, that of the Boeress. The little Boerlings are all dirty;--so that, even when they are pretty, one does not wish to kiss them. The Boers are very prolific, marrying early and living a wholesome, and I think, a moral life. They are much given to marrying, the widow or the widower very speedily taking another spouse, so that there will sometimes be three or four families in the one house. The women have children very early in life,--but then they have children very late also; which seems to indicate that their manner of living is natural and healthy. I have heard them ridiculed for their speedy changes of marital affection, but it seems to me natural that a man or a woman living far apart from neighbours should require the comfort of a companion.
I am quite convinced that they are belied by the allegation which denies to them all progress in civilization. The continued increase in the number of British and German storekeepers in the country, who grow rich on their trade with the Boers, is sufficient of itself to tell one this. Twenty years since I am assured that it was a common thing for a Boer to be clad in skins. Now they wear woollen clothing, with calico. I fancy that the traveller would have to travel very far before he found a skin-clad Boer. No doubt they are parsimonious;--it might perhaps be more fair to call them prone to save. I, personally, regard saving as a mistake, thinking that the improvement of the world generally is best furthered by a free use of the good things which are earned,--and that they who do not themselves earn them should, as a rule, not have them. It is a large question, which my readers would not thank me to discuss here. But there are two sides to it,--and the parsimony of the Boer who will eat up the carcase of a wild beast till it be rotten so that he need not kill a sheep, and may thus be enabled to stock a farm for his son, will have its admirers in Great Britain,--if not among fathers at any rate among sons. These people are not great consumers, as are our farmers. They wear their clothes longer, and stretch their means further; but that the Boer of to-day consumes very much more than his father there can be no doubt;--and as little that his sons and daughters will consume more.
As to their educational condition I found it very difficult to ascertain facts. The distance of these homesteads one from another makes school teaching in many instances impossible. In some cases I found that great efforts were made, the mother or perhaps the mother’s sister teaching the children to read. Here and there I heard of boys and girls who were sent long distances,--at an expense not only for teaching but for boarding. It has, however, to be acknowledged that the education of the country is at present very deficient. The country is now ours and when the first rudiments of stability have been fixed, so that laws may be administered and taxes collected, then I trust that the rulers of the Transvaal may find themselves able to do something towards bringing education nearer to the Boers.
Anthony Trollope arrived in the Transvaal just after its annexation by Britain in August 1877, a fact he notes with precision: the border crossing occurred twenty miles north of Newcastle, and the new colony was now under Her Majesty's dominion. His account, written in the first person, is less a travel diary than a report on the region's political and economic state. The distance from Newcastle to Pretoria—207 miles—is given without railway relief, underscoring the remoteness he sought to explore. Trollope admits his prior ignorance: the Transvaal had been a foreign republic he associated with unstable South American states. Now, he asserts, every sod of its soil had instantly doubled in value.
A Reporter's Gaze on Annexation
Trollope frames the Transvaal's annexation as a fait accompli, but his language reveals a careful observer rather than a propagandist. He notes that the boundary of the Orange Free State is only two or three miles distant, and Zulu Land's border is ill defined, creating a narrow neck of land if the colonies were to combine. This geographical detail is not mere description; it hints at the strategic tensions Trollope encountered. He does not argue for or against annexation, but records that all concerned were assured of future security. The reader senses a writer weighing evidence: the doubling of land value is presented as a local belief, not a universal truth. Trollope's tone is that of a parliamentary reporter, documenting what he saw and heard without overt judgment.
Diamond Theft and Labor at Kimberley
The diamond mines of Griqualand West occupy a substantial portion of the volume, and Trollope's account is notable for its detailed description of theft and labor. He explains the mining process: blue ground is broken up, converted to mud by stationary rakes, and the stones fall to the bottom, with diamonds being the heaviest. But his focus quickly shifts to the Kafir workers, whom he describes as 'great thieves' who take 'individual and national pride' in stealing diamonds. Trollope claims that Kafir chiefs instruct their men to steal, and that illicit dealers buy the stones for a fraction of their value. He cites a figure of 25 percent theft but doubts it. The wages—ten shillings a week plus food—are presented as fluctuating, with a range from 7s. 6d. to 30s. Trollope's language is blunt and reflects the racial attitudes of his time, but it also provides a rare contemporary account of labor conditions and the informal economy surrounding the mines.
The Structure of a Travelogue-Political Hybrid
The volume's table of contents reveals a deliberate structure: chapters on the Transvaal (history, annexation, Pretoria, condition and products), then Griqualand West (why we took it, story of the diamond fields, Kimberley), followed by the Orange Free State (early history, present condition, Bloemfontein), and finally native territories including Thaba 'Ncho, Kreli and his Kafirs, the Basutos, and Namaqualand. This organization suggests Trollope intended a comprehensive survey, moving from the newly annexed British territory to the independent Boer republic and then to African polities. The excerpts show he blends personal narrative with statistical and historical data, as when he cites engineer Mr. Oats's evidence on annual wages at Kimberley (from £600,000 to £1,600,000). The book is neither pure travelogue nor dry report; it is a hybrid that reflects Trollope's background as a novelist and his interest in administrative and economic details.
Readers approaching this volume should expect a work that is as much about British imperial policy as about the landscapes and peoples of southern Africa. Trollope's voice is that of a Victorian gentleman-reporter, curious and opinionated, but he grounds his observations in specific dates, distances, and testimonies. The excerpts do not reveal the full arc of his argument, but they show a writer attentive to the material conditions of colonization—from the price of mealies to the mechanics of diamond theft. This is not a romantic travel book; it is a document of a particular historical moment, filtered through a shrewd and sometimes uncomfortable sensibility.
Trollope’s South African volume shares that restlessness I’ve always cherished—the urge to understand a place through its contested edges. It reminded me of another of his journeys, where he turned westward to the Mormons, weighing the same delicate question of nationhood and belief. Both books keep me company on quiet shelves, whispering of empires measured in dusty miles. Sinners and Saints A Tour Across the States and Round Them, with Three Months Among the Mormons — Text and Context holds that same gentle, curious temper.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.
Grayson Lewis
1 month ago