A
Architizer Editors
Guest
- Thread Author
- #1
The 15th Architizer A+Awards has officially launched! Seize the lowest pricing of the season by entering before October 23rd, 2026. Learn more →
Plenty of firms enter a genuinely good project in awards programs and lose. Such losses, however, don’t necessarily reflect the quality of the design itself. Sometimes, they’re more indicative of an error in the architectural awards entry — a misreading of what makes the project exceptional, and therefore, what it should be rewarded on.
For example, a superb but tiny home may be submitted in a category for small homes. Yet, it would be judged against similarly sized houses twice its budget. But, were it placed in a more conceptual category, one that rewards based on the type of material used, or themes such as “Color,” it may have taken a top prize. The work was strong, but it was being measured up against the wrong bar. So, if you’re thinking about entering a design in Architizer’s A+Awards this year, before starting your submission, consider the categories — and the different aspects of the profession that they highlight — at length.
Casa Gana by TOUCH Architect, Khao Yai, Thailand | Popular Choice Winner, Architecture +Home, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The A+Awards run on four families of categories. Typology is about how well a building does the job it was built for, whereas the Plus Categories are about everything else going on in a building — the material, the detail, the idea. Sustainability is its own family, and the Firm Categories drop the individual project and look at the practice as a whole. Where your work sits across these is partly about where it can win. It’s also a question you’re going to be answering all year regardless: what do you want this practice known for?
It also shapes how the work gets written about, here and elsewhere. The category you choose is the first line of the story; it’s one that will jump at editors selecting projects for deep dives and interviews. A win travels into our coverage and the press that follows, and it travels as whatever you framed it as. So the choice is less like filling in a form than deciding how you want this year to read later — for a client who finds the win, or a graduate deciding where to start, long after the night itself.
Harry The Hirer Headquarters by Riofrio Carroll Architects, Melbourne, Australia | Popular Choice Winner, Commercial Interiors (>25,000 square feet), 14th Architizer A+Awards
The job at the center of the discipline is making buildings, and the Typology Categories take it on those terms. Your project competes against others doing the same job. Houses against houses, sorted by size, so a small one isn’t up against something four times its footprint. Offices against offices, tower against tower. Then hospitality, cultural, institutional, landscape, transportation, each cut finely, with a run of Unbuilt categories for the projects that will shift how the profession thinks without ever getting built.
Winning here needs no explaining. A client reads a typology win and understands it instantly: this firm is among the best there is at the exact thing I need built. If you have a specialism, nothing else says so as plainly.
Discover the Typology categories →
Stone Villa by Feldman Architecture, Carmel-by-the-Sea, California | Jury Winner, Architecture +Stone, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Typology asks what a building is for. The Plus Categories ask what else it’s doing, and they cover ground most awards programs leave out. They work at two scales. The Concept Categories take the long view, recognizing how a project meets an idea or a pressure the whole profession is dealing with: +Adaptive Reuse, +Context, +Public Interest. The Detail Categories come down to the surface: +Brick, +Concrete, +Wood, +Stone, +Façades.
If an architect isn’t sure that they have anything to enter, this is where I send them. These categories make room for the achievements that otherwise go unnamed — the junction that took three tries to resolve, or the building whose real success is the way it gathers a neighborhood around it. A project can enter here and in its typology at once, and win twice, for two different reasons.
There’s an editorial side to this, too. A Plus category lets you say what a project is about, not just what it is. A housing block is a housing block in its typology; entered in +Community or +Human Design, it becomes a story about something. You’re telling us which part of the work to look at, and that framing is often what a writer picks up and runs with.
Discover the Plus categories →
Shenzhen Guangming International Equestrian Center by Tanghua Architects, Shenzhen, China | Jury Winner, Sustainable Sports & Recreation Building, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Sustainability has its own family because it’s stopped being a feature of good buildings and has become a field in its own right. One day every building will meet these criteria; for now, the winners here are setting the bar for everyone else.
The work is aimed at a built environment that’s less wasteful, more equitable, and better prepared for a warming climate. This definition runs wider than mechanical systems, evaluating the health of the people inside and how the building was constructed. There’s a Sustainable Private House, a Sustainable Materials Project, a Design for Wellbeing Project, and newer additions like +Regenerative Design, for buildings that give more back to their site than they take.
Read the entry requirement closely. Nothing gets in without meeting at least nine of the sustainability criteria we publish. Without that threshold, the word means whatever an entrant wants it to, and given how much of the world’s carbon comes from construction, that felt like too much to leave open.
Discover the Sustainability categories →
Mount Tamalpais Meadow by Boxleaf Design Landscape Architecture, Marin County, California | Popular Choice Winner, Private Garden & Popular Choice Winner, Best Landscape Design Firm, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The first three families are about the work. This one is about the practice that makes it. You’re judged on a portfolio, not a single building, and it splits two ways. Firm Type sorts by size and stage, from the one-to-five-person studio up through the large offices, with a Best Young Firm for practices still early on. Specialization follows the thread running through a body of work: Best Adaptive Reuse and Renovation Firm, Best in Craft Firm, Best Residential Firm, Best in Sustainability Firm, and the new Best Human-Centered Design Firm.
The size brackets matter. A studio of four is judged against other studios of four, not against a hundred-person office with staff hired to enter competitions. Entering means putting forward at least three projects built in the past ten years, which moves the question off any one good building and onto whether the practice held its standard across a decade. For a lot of firms, it’s a recognition they can’t get anywhere else.
Discover the Firm categories →
House of Memories by Studio Lagom, Valsad, GJ, India | Popular Choice Winner, Design for Wellbeing Project, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Choosing well is half of it. The other half is entering as though you chose on purpose, and this is where most entries fall down. The most common mistake we see is a strong project submitted with a pasted-in press release or a recap of the client brief — copy that says what the building is rather than explaining why it belongs in this category.
The judges aren’t reading to find out what you built. They’re deciding whether it’s the best of what was entered here, so tell them, in your own words, why it is. In a Plus category, speak to the theme directly: what does this project do for +Community or +Human Design that another good building wouldn’t? Why was the use of metal innovative? In a Typology category, name the moves that push the type forward, the thing you solved that the next school or house didn’t.
Your images carry the same weight. Beautiful hero shots prove the building photographs well; they don’t prove your point. If the argument is reuse, show what was kept and what it became. If it’s craft, get close enough to see it. The pictures should make the same case as the words, not decorate it.
Bézier Sofa by Studio MK27 | Jury Winner, Residential Furniture, 2026 A+Product Awards
A fair number of firms don’t stop at buildings. If yours has designed a product — a light, a fixture, a tile, a piece of furniture, a building system — there’s a separate program for it. The A+Product Awards judge the objects architects design and specify on the same principle as the rest: not the catalog description, but what makes the thing better than what it’s up against. If you’ve made something you’re proud of, it’s worth an entry of its own.
Learn more about A+Products →
The 15th Architizer A+Awards has officially launched! Seize the lowest pricing of the season by entering before October 23rd, 2026. Learn more →
Top image: The Twenty Two New York by BKSK Architects, Manhattan, New York | Popular Choice Winner, Commercial Adaptive Reuse, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The post Why Great Projects Lose Awards for Reasons That Have Nothing to Do With the Work appeared first on Journal.
Plenty of firms enter a genuinely good project in awards programs and lose. Such losses, however, don’t necessarily reflect the quality of the design itself. Sometimes, they’re more indicative of an error in the architectural awards entry — a misreading of what makes the project exceptional, and therefore, what it should be rewarded on.
For example, a superb but tiny home may be submitted in a category for small homes. Yet, it would be judged against similarly sized houses twice its budget. But, were it placed in a more conceptual category, one that rewards based on the type of material used, or themes such as “Color,” it may have taken a top prize. The work was strong, but it was being measured up against the wrong bar. So, if you’re thinking about entering a design in Architizer’s A+Awards this year, before starting your submission, consider the categories — and the different aspects of the profession that they highlight — at length.
Casa Gana by TOUCH Architect, Khao Yai, Thailand | Popular Choice Winner, Architecture +Home, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The A+Awards run on four families of categories. Typology is about how well a building does the job it was built for, whereas the Plus Categories are about everything else going on in a building — the material, the detail, the idea. Sustainability is its own family, and the Firm Categories drop the individual project and look at the practice as a whole. Where your work sits across these is partly about where it can win. It’s also a question you’re going to be answering all year regardless: what do you want this practice known for?
It also shapes how the work gets written about, here and elsewhere. The category you choose is the first line of the story; it’s one that will jump at editors selecting projects for deep dives and interviews. A win travels into our coverage and the press that follows, and it travels as whatever you framed it as. So the choice is less like filling in a form than deciding how you want this year to read later — for a client who finds the win, or a graduate deciding where to start, long after the night itself.
The Typology Categories
Harry The Hirer Headquarters by Riofrio Carroll Architects, Melbourne, Australia | Popular Choice Winner, Commercial Interiors (>25,000 square feet), 14th Architizer A+Awards
The job at the center of the discipline is making buildings, and the Typology Categories take it on those terms. Your project competes against others doing the same job. Houses against houses, sorted by size, so a small one isn’t up against something four times its footprint. Offices against offices, tower against tower. Then hospitality, cultural, institutional, landscape, transportation, each cut finely, with a run of Unbuilt categories for the projects that will shift how the profession thinks without ever getting built.
Winning here needs no explaining. A client reads a typology win and understands it instantly: this firm is among the best there is at the exact thing I need built. If you have a specialism, nothing else says so as plainly.
Discover the Typology categories →
The Plus Categories
Stone Villa by Feldman Architecture, Carmel-by-the-Sea, California | Jury Winner, Architecture +Stone, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Typology asks what a building is for. The Plus Categories ask what else it’s doing, and they cover ground most awards programs leave out. They work at two scales. The Concept Categories take the long view, recognizing how a project meets an idea or a pressure the whole profession is dealing with: +Adaptive Reuse, +Context, +Public Interest. The Detail Categories come down to the surface: +Brick, +Concrete, +Wood, +Stone, +Façades.
If an architect isn’t sure that they have anything to enter, this is where I send them. These categories make room for the achievements that otherwise go unnamed — the junction that took three tries to resolve, or the building whose real success is the way it gathers a neighborhood around it. A project can enter here and in its typology at once, and win twice, for two different reasons.
There’s an editorial side to this, too. A Plus category lets you say what a project is about, not just what it is. A housing block is a housing block in its typology; entered in +Community or +Human Design, it becomes a story about something. You’re telling us which part of the work to look at, and that framing is often what a writer picks up and runs with.
Discover the Plus categories →
The Sustainability Categories
Shenzhen Guangming International Equestrian Center by Tanghua Architects, Shenzhen, China | Jury Winner, Sustainable Sports & Recreation Building, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Sustainability has its own family because it’s stopped being a feature of good buildings and has become a field in its own right. One day every building will meet these criteria; for now, the winners here are setting the bar for everyone else.
The work is aimed at a built environment that’s less wasteful, more equitable, and better prepared for a warming climate. This definition runs wider than mechanical systems, evaluating the health of the people inside and how the building was constructed. There’s a Sustainable Private House, a Sustainable Materials Project, a Design for Wellbeing Project, and newer additions like +Regenerative Design, for buildings that give more back to their site than they take.
Read the entry requirement closely. Nothing gets in without meeting at least nine of the sustainability criteria we publish. Without that threshold, the word means whatever an entrant wants it to, and given how much of the world’s carbon comes from construction, that felt like too much to leave open.
Discover the Sustainability categories →
The Firm Categories
Mount Tamalpais Meadow by Boxleaf Design Landscape Architecture, Marin County, California | Popular Choice Winner, Private Garden & Popular Choice Winner, Best Landscape Design Firm, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The first three families are about the work. This one is about the practice that makes it. You’re judged on a portfolio, not a single building, and it splits two ways. Firm Type sorts by size and stage, from the one-to-five-person studio up through the large offices, with a Best Young Firm for practices still early on. Specialization follows the thread running through a body of work: Best Adaptive Reuse and Renovation Firm, Best in Craft Firm, Best Residential Firm, Best in Sustainability Firm, and the new Best Human-Centered Design Firm.
The size brackets matter. A studio of four is judged against other studios of four, not against a hundred-person office with staff hired to enter competitions. Entering means putting forward at least three projects built in the past ten years, which moves the question off any one good building and onto whether the practice held its standard across a decade. For a lot of firms, it’s a recognition they can’t get anywhere else.
Discover the Firm categories →
Make the Case for the Category You Picked
House of Memories by Studio Lagom, Valsad, GJ, India | Popular Choice Winner, Design for Wellbeing Project, 14th Architizer A+Awards
Choosing well is half of it. The other half is entering as though you chose on purpose, and this is where most entries fall down. The most common mistake we see is a strong project submitted with a pasted-in press release or a recap of the client brief — copy that says what the building is rather than explaining why it belongs in this category.
The judges aren’t reading to find out what you built. They’re deciding whether it’s the best of what was entered here, so tell them, in your own words, why it is. In a Plus category, speak to the theme directly: what does this project do for +Community or +Human Design that another good building wouldn’t? Why was the use of metal innovative? In a Typology category, name the moves that push the type forward, the thing you solved that the next school or house didn’t.
Your images carry the same weight. Beautiful hero shots prove the building photographs well; they don’t prove your point. If the argument is reuse, show what was kept and what it became. If it’s craft, get close enough to see it. The pictures should make the same case as the words, not decorate it.
One More, if You Make Things As Well as Buildings
Bézier Sofa by Studio MK27 | Jury Winner, Residential Furniture, 2026 A+Product Awards
A fair number of firms don’t stop at buildings. If yours has designed a product — a light, a fixture, a tile, a piece of furniture, a building system — there’s a separate program for it. The A+Product Awards judge the objects architects design and specify on the same principle as the rest: not the catalog description, but what makes the thing better than what it’s up against. If you’ve made something you’re proud of, it’s worth an entry of its own.
Learn more about A+Products →
The 15th Architizer A+Awards has officially launched! Seize the lowest pricing of the season by entering before October 23rd, 2026. Learn more →
Top image: The Twenty Two New York by BKSK Architects, Manhattan, New York | Popular Choice Winner, Commercial Adaptive Reuse, 14th Architizer A+Awards
The post Why Great Projects Lose Awards for Reasons That Have Nothing to Do With the Work appeared first on Journal.